job


                    
                    
                

                

                

            

        
    







            

            
            

                

                    
                

                

                    

                        


	

	
    

        🔥 | Latest
    

    
    

        

        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            




    cnn.com, Facepalm, and Martin: MEDIA . Published January 15, 2019 . Last Update an hour ago
 CNN legal analyst Areva
 Martin accuses David Webb
 of 'white privilege' before
 learning he's black
 By Brian Flood | Fox News
 10
 10

 i
 Tegal
 alalys
 Areva Martin on Tuesday
 Martin accused Sirius XM radio and Fox Nation
 host David Webb of "white privilege" during a
 segment on a radio program before he broke the
 news
 "Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should've
 been better prepped. I'm black," Webb said
 MSNBC'S STEPHANIE RUHLE IMPLIES TRUMP IS
 BLACKMAILING LINDSEY GRAHAM OVER
 SOMETHING PRETTY EXTREME
 The embarrassing moment occurred during a
 discussion about experience being more important
 than race when determining whether or not someone
 is qualified for a particular job

 'Ve Choseh to cross dlTrerent parts of the medla
 world, done the work so that I'm qualified to be in
 each one. I never considered my color the issue, I
 considered my qualifications the issue," Webb said
 "That's a whole, another long conversation about
 white privilege, the things that you have the privilege
 of doing, that people of color don't have the privilege
 of." said Martin-who also hosts CBS' "Face the
 Truth."
 A dumbfounded Webb asked, "How do I have the
 privilege of white privilege?"
 15
 NETWORKS' NIGHTLY NEWSCASTS HAVE
 INCESSANTLY HOSTILE' TONE TOWARD TRUMFP,
 STUDY INDICATES

 Martin responded, "David, by virtue of being a white
 male you have white privilege."
 The Fox Nation host then explained that he was
 actually black
 "I stand corrected," Martin said
 Webb scolded Martin for running with an
 "assumption" and she then blamed her team for
 providing inaccurate information
 "That's actually insulting," Webb saic
 "It is and I apologize," Martin replied. "l was given
 wrong information."
 15
 Martin's spokesperson declined a request for
 comment
White privilege ????
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                cnn.com, Facepalm, and Martin: MEDIA . Published January 15, 2019 . Last Update an hour ago
 CNN legal analyst Areva
 Martin accuses David Webb
 of 'white privilege' before
 learning he's black
 By Brian Flood | Fox News
 10
 10

 i
 Tegal
 alalys
 Areva Martin on Tuesday
 Martin accused Sirius XM radio and Fox Nation
 host David Webb of "white privilege" during a
 segment on a radio program before he broke the
 news
 "Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should've
 been better prepped. I'm black," Webb said
 MSNBC'S STEPHANIE RUHLE IMPLIES TRUMP IS
 BLACKMAILING LINDSEY GRAHAM OVER
 SOMETHING PRETTY EXTREME
 The embarrassing moment occurred during a
 discussion about experience being more important
 than race when determining whether or not someone
 is qualified for a particular job

 'Ve Choseh to cross dlTrerent parts of the medla
 world, done the work so that I'm qualified to be in
 each one. I never considered my color the issue, I
 considered my qualifications the issue," Webb said
 "That's a whole, another long conversation about
 white privilege, the things that you have the privilege
 of doing, that people of color don't have the privilege
 of." said Martin-who also hosts CBS' "Face the
 Truth."
 A dumbfounded Webb asked, "How do I have the
 privilege of white privilege?"
 15
 NETWORKS' NIGHTLY NEWSCASTS HAVE
 INCESSANTLY HOSTILE' TONE TOWARD TRUMFP,
 STUDY INDICATES

 Martin responded, "David, by virtue of being a white
 male you have white privilege."
 The Fox Nation host then explained that he was
 actually black
 "I stand corrected," Martin said
 Webb scolded Martin for running with an
 "assumption" and she then blamed her team for
 providing inaccurate information
 "That's actually insulting," Webb saic
 "It is and I apologize," Martin replied. "l was given
 wrong information."
 15
 Martin's spokesperson declined a request for
 comment
White privilege ????
                
            

            
            
White privilege ????

            
            
        

    



        

            
        
        

            




    cnn.com, Martin, and News: MEDIA . Published January 15, 2019 . Last Update an hour ago
 CNN legal analyst Areva
 Martin accuses David Webb
 of 'white privilege' before
 learning he's black
 By Brian Flood | Fox News
 10
 10

 i
 Tegal
 alalys
 Areva Martin on Tuesday
 Martin accused Sirius XM radio and Fox Nation
 host David Webb of "white privilege" during a
 segment on a radio program before he broke the
 news
 "Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should've
 been better prepped. I'm black," Webb said
 MSNBC'S STEPHANIE RUHLE IMPLIES TRUMP IS
 BLACKMAILING LINDSEY GRAHAM OVER
 SOMETHING PRETTY EXTREME
 The embarrassing moment occurred during a
 discussion about experience being more important
 than race when determining whether or not someone
 is qualified for a particular job

 'Ve Choseh to cross dlTrerent parts of the medla
 world, done the work so that I'm qualified to be in
 each one. I never considered my color the issue, I
 considered my qualifications the issue," Webb said
 "That's a whole, another long conversation about
 white privilege, the things that you have the privilege
 of doing, that people of color don't have the privilege
 of." said Martin-who also hosts CBS' "Face the
 Truth."
 A dumbfounded Webb asked, "How do I have the
 privilege of white privilege?"
 15
 NETWORKS' NIGHTLY NEWSCASTS HAVE
 INCESSANTLY HOSTILE' TONE TOWARD TRUMFP,
 STUDY INDICATES

 Martin responded, "David, by virtue of being a white
 male you have white privilege."
 The Fox Nation host then explained that he was
 actually black
 "I stand corrected," Martin said
 Webb scolded Martin for running with an
 "assumption" and she then blamed her team for
 providing inaccurate information
 "That's actually insulting," Webb saic
 "It is and I apologize," Martin replied. "l was given
 wrong information."
 15
 Martin's spokesperson declined a request for
 comment
White privilege ????
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                cnn.com, Martin, and News: MEDIA . Published January 15, 2019 . Last Update an hour ago
 CNN legal analyst Areva
 Martin accuses David Webb
 of 'white privilege' before
 learning he's black
 By Brian Flood | Fox News
 10
 10

 i
 Tegal
 alalys
 Areva Martin on Tuesday
 Martin accused Sirius XM radio and Fox Nation
 host David Webb of "white privilege" during a
 segment on a radio program before he broke the
 news
 "Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should've
 been better prepped. I'm black," Webb said
 MSNBC'S STEPHANIE RUHLE IMPLIES TRUMP IS
 BLACKMAILING LINDSEY GRAHAM OVER
 SOMETHING PRETTY EXTREME
 The embarrassing moment occurred during a
 discussion about experience being more important
 than race when determining whether or not someone
 is qualified for a particular job

 'Ve Choseh to cross dlTrerent parts of the medla
 world, done the work so that I'm qualified to be in
 each one. I never considered my color the issue, I
 considered my qualifications the issue," Webb said
 "That's a whole, another long conversation about
 white privilege, the things that you have the privilege
 of doing, that people of color don't have the privilege
 of." said Martin-who also hosts CBS' "Face the
 Truth."
 A dumbfounded Webb asked, "How do I have the
 privilege of white privilege?"
 15
 NETWORKS' NIGHTLY NEWSCASTS HAVE
 INCESSANTLY HOSTILE' TONE TOWARD TRUMFP,
 STUDY INDICATES

 Martin responded, "David, by virtue of being a white
 male you have white privilege."
 The Fox Nation host then explained that he was
 actually black
 "I stand corrected," Martin said
 Webb scolded Martin for running with an
 "assumption" and she then blamed her team for
 providing inaccurate information
 "That's actually insulting," Webb saic
 "It is and I apologize," Martin replied. "l was given
 wrong information."
 15
 Martin's spokesperson declined a request for
 comment
White privilege ????
                
            

            
            
White privilege ????

            
            
        

    



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            




    Apparently, Beer, and Dude: Emily Holmes
 January 2 at 11:26 AM
 Liberal Friends, listen to this right now: Democratic Nominees are not clay
 pigeons
 I repeat.
 DEMOCRATIC NOMINEES ARE NOT CLAY PIGEONS
 But, Emily, whatever do you mean? What is this metaphor?
 It goes like this
 One by one, over the next couple of months, Democratic nominees are
 going to launch their official bids for President. They are going to launch
 themselves, one by one, into the sky, right into our line of vision
 Our job is not to shoot them.
 Our job is NOT, the second we see them cross the sky, to reach out for the
 gun being handed to us by conservatives (because duh, conservatives and
 guns) and take aim, and blast them, one by one out of the air, for not being
 absolutely perfect.
 Not likeable enough. BOOM
 Not an inspiring enough speaker. BOOM
 Said that awkward thing that one time. BOOM
 I wouldn't want to have a beer with them. BOOM
 Too old. BOOM. Too female. BOOM. Too white. BOOM
 Not a fucking flawless progressive superhero. BOOM
 Because what happens next? We shoot the candidates down. We degrade
 them. We belittle them. We smear them. Then we hand the gun to the
 media. They do the same. They hand the gun to the conservatives. They do
 the same. Then the bots start reloading. BOOM. BOOM. BOOM
 And then at the end of primary season, we have to pick up the shattered
 remains of whoever got the most votes and attempt to glue them back
 together into a candidate who can win the general election.
 And we will lose. Because we learned fucking NOTHING from 2016,
 apparently
 Trump didn't win because every conservative loves him. Most of them hate
 his fucking guts. But they held their noses and voted for him because he
 was the only way to push their agenda forward. And holy shit, have they
 pushed it. Despite his complete ineptitude, his bumbling, his gross
 incompetence, his blatant corruption, they have shoved through some
 really damaging policies that are hurting real people every single day, and
 they will continue to do so for as long as we let them

 So, here we are. You're not jazzed about Liz Warren? Awesome. Beto not
 your boy? Swell. Sick of Biden memes? Good for you, friend. Keep it to
 yourself. Why? Because EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT WHO RUNS IS
 INFINITELY BETTER FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY THAN THE
 FLAMING RACIST POPULIST TRASH CURRENTLY STEERING THIS
 COUNTRY DIRECTLY INTO THE SUN.
 I'm not sure if you noticed, but we already elected a guy based on a cult of
 personality rather than on whether he was qualified in any way to do the
 iob, and we're going to be putting out the flames for DECADES
 But what do we do instead, you ask? Watch debates. Compare platforms
 Be informed. Choose your favorite BASED ON REAL FACTUAL POLICIES
 AND EXPERIENCE, NOT ON YOUR DELICATE FEELINGS AND WHETHER
 YOU FEEL SUFFICIENTLY ENTERTAINED OR INEXPLICABLY HAPPY AT THE
 VERY SIGHT OF THEIR GLOWING FACE. Then get involved. Register
 people. Drive to the polls. Hold signs on street corners. Write postcards
 Knock on doors. Don't tell us why the other candidates suck, tell us why
 yours is THE BEST. Fight FOR them. Remember how we used to fight FOR
 things, rather than against them? I know Trump makes it hard to remember,
 but I promise, that's a thing we used to know how to do
 Then we all, collectively, wholeheartedly, throw our weight and energy and
 voice behind whoever gets the nomination. If we do that, we win. Period
 It's not a question of who can beat Trump, don't you get it? A sentient
 fucking houseplant with a liberal platform could beat Trump, if we do this
 right. It's a question of whether WE can beat him, or would we rather tear
 ourselves apart?
 Look around you, folks. The stock market is in free-fall. Our international
 reputation is in tatters. Our foreign policy is for sale to dictators. Our free
 press is under daily attack. Our Supreme Court is one conservative white
 dude away from full-on Gilead, and we can't keep asking an 84-year-old
 woman recovering from broken ribs and a third bout of cancer to hang on
 for six more years because we can't get our heads out of our own asses. I
 mean, she'll do it, obviously, because RBG is a BOSS, but she shouldn't
 have to.
 I repeat. This is not a test of our candidates. There are lots of good, solid
 options. It's a test of US. Of OUR ability to unite. Of OUR strength. Of OUR
 ability to put aside selfish arbitrary purity tests and scales of "likeability"
 and to just FUCKING GET IT DONE. We don't need the perfect candidate to
 rescue us. We need to realize that we can rescue ourselves
 So, how about it, Resistance? They want us to forget that we have the
 numbers, the motivation, and the power. They want us to implode. Let's
 explode instead, and leave nothing but a charred ruin of this nightmare
 administration in our wake.
 BOOM
 1.4K Comments 6.7K Shares
onceuponamirror:

helenofhere:

snarksandkisses:


Also good to keep THIS SHIT in mind:


This is the most important post on this platform since early 2016. 


WE ARE NOT FUCKING IT UP TWICE. DO NOT LET PROPAGANDA AND MANIPULATION DIVIDE US AGAINST GETTING THIS MONSTER OUT. thanks 

    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Apparently, Beer, and Dude: Emily Holmes
 January 2 at 11:26 AM
 Liberal Friends, listen to this right now: Democratic Nominees are not clay
 pigeons
 I repeat.
 DEMOCRATIC NOMINEES ARE NOT CLAY PIGEONS
 But, Emily, whatever do you mean? What is this metaphor?
 It goes like this
 One by one, over the next couple of months, Democratic nominees are
 going to launch their official bids for President. They are going to launch
 themselves, one by one, into the sky, right into our line of vision
 Our job is not to shoot them.
 Our job is NOT, the second we see them cross the sky, to reach out for the
 gun being handed to us by conservatives (because duh, conservatives and
 guns) and take aim, and blast them, one by one out of the air, for not being
 absolutely perfect.
 Not likeable enough. BOOM
 Not an inspiring enough speaker. BOOM
 Said that awkward thing that one time. BOOM
 I wouldn't want to have a beer with them. BOOM
 Too old. BOOM. Too female. BOOM. Too white. BOOM
 Not a fucking flawless progressive superhero. BOOM
 Because what happens next? We shoot the candidates down. We degrade
 them. We belittle them. We smear them. Then we hand the gun to the
 media. They do the same. They hand the gun to the conservatives. They do
 the same. Then the bots start reloading. BOOM. BOOM. BOOM
 And then at the end of primary season, we have to pick up the shattered
 remains of whoever got the most votes and attempt to glue them back
 together into a candidate who can win the general election.
 And we will lose. Because we learned fucking NOTHING from 2016,
 apparently
 Trump didn't win because every conservative loves him. Most of them hate
 his fucking guts. But they held their noses and voted for him because he
 was the only way to push their agenda forward. And holy shit, have they
 pushed it. Despite his complete ineptitude, his bumbling, his gross
 incompetence, his blatant corruption, they have shoved through some
 really damaging policies that are hurting real people every single day, and
 they will continue to do so for as long as we let them

 So, here we are. You're not jazzed about Liz Warren? Awesome. Beto not
 your boy? Swell. Sick of Biden memes? Good for you, friend. Keep it to
 yourself. Why? Because EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT WHO RUNS IS
 INFINITELY BETTER FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY THAN THE
 FLAMING RACIST POPULIST TRASH CURRENTLY STEERING THIS
 COUNTRY DIRECTLY INTO THE SUN.
 I'm not sure if you noticed, but we already elected a guy based on a cult of
 personality rather than on whether he was qualified in any way to do the
 iob, and we're going to be putting out the flames for DECADES
 But what do we do instead, you ask? Watch debates. Compare platforms
 Be informed. Choose your favorite BASED ON REAL FACTUAL POLICIES
 AND EXPERIENCE, NOT ON YOUR DELICATE FEELINGS AND WHETHER
 YOU FEEL SUFFICIENTLY ENTERTAINED OR INEXPLICABLY HAPPY AT THE
 VERY SIGHT OF THEIR GLOWING FACE. Then get involved. Register
 people. Drive to the polls. Hold signs on street corners. Write postcards
 Knock on doors. Don't tell us why the other candidates suck, tell us why
 yours is THE BEST. Fight FOR them. Remember how we used to fight FOR
 things, rather than against them? I know Trump makes it hard to remember,
 but I promise, that's a thing we used to know how to do
 Then we all, collectively, wholeheartedly, throw our weight and energy and
 voice behind whoever gets the nomination. If we do that, we win. Period
 It's not a question of who can beat Trump, don't you get it? A sentient
 fucking houseplant with a liberal platform could beat Trump, if we do this
 right. It's a question of whether WE can beat him, or would we rather tear
 ourselves apart?
 Look around you, folks. The stock market is in free-fall. Our international
 reputation is in tatters. Our foreign policy is for sale to dictators. Our free
 press is under daily attack. Our Supreme Court is one conservative white
 dude away from full-on Gilead, and we can't keep asking an 84-year-old
 woman recovering from broken ribs and a third bout of cancer to hang on
 for six more years because we can't get our heads out of our own asses. I
 mean, she'll do it, obviously, because RBG is a BOSS, but she shouldn't
 have to.
 I repeat. This is not a test of our candidates. There are lots of good, solid
 options. It's a test of US. Of OUR ability to unite. Of OUR strength. Of OUR
 ability to put aside selfish arbitrary purity tests and scales of "likeability"
 and to just FUCKING GET IT DONE. We don't need the perfect candidate to
 rescue us. We need to realize that we can rescue ourselves
 So, how about it, Resistance? They want us to forget that we have the
 numbers, the motivation, and the power. They want us to implode. Let's
 explode instead, and leave nothing but a charred ruin of this nightmare
 administration in our wake.
 BOOM
 1.4K Comments 6.7K Shares
onceuponamirror:

helenofhere:

snarksandkisses:


Also good to keep THIS SHIT in mind:


This is the most important post on this platform since early 2016. 


WE ARE NOT FUCKING IT UP TWICE. DO NOT LET PROPAGANDA AND MANIPULATION DIVIDE US AGAINST GETTING THIS MONSTER OUT. thanks 

                
            

            
            
onceuponamirror:

helenofhere:

snarksandkisses:


Also good to keep THIS SHIT in mind:


This is the most important post on this platform s...

            
            
        

    



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            




    Bill Clinton, Dude, and Fbi: Did Bill Clinton Fire His FBI
 Director One Day Before Vince
 Foster Died?

 Rating
 Mixture
 About this rating
 What's True
 President Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions on 19 July 1993, one day before Deputy White
 House Counsel Vince Foster, a longtime associate of the Clintons, was found dead of a self-inflicted
 gunshot wound.
 What's False
 There is nothing inherently suspicious about the coincidental timing of Sessions's firing and Vince
 Foster's death (which was determined to be a suicide)
sapphleaf:

libertarirynn:

sapphleaf:

mccarthyites:

eltigrechico:
Gotta love Snopes!
And here I was, an idiot, thinking this post was overly exaggerated for comedic effect


Except what Snopes is actually saying is that, while the explicit claim that the death occurred the day after the firing, what’s false is the implied argument—and often explicitly asserted as well—that the two events have any relation.post hoc ergo propter hoc

Except it still isn’t a “mixture” because the statement “Bill Clinton fired his FBI director the day before Vince Foster died“ is irrefutably correct.

Yeah but it’s still right to point out that implied connection is not based in fact or logic.Yes, the statement at face value is literal truth, but critical thinking means evaluating the truth and validity of the actual argument.

Dude are you being serious right now? As a fact checking site it’s not their job to evaluate what “implied connections“ they need to “correct“. The idea is state what’s true and what’s not. Stating that Bill Clinton fired his FBI director before Vince Foster died is not a “mixture“ of truth and falsehood. Period.
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Bill Clinton, Dude, and Fbi: Did Bill Clinton Fire His FBI
 Director One Day Before Vince
 Foster Died?

 Rating
 Mixture
 About this rating
 What's True
 President Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions on 19 July 1993, one day before Deputy White
 House Counsel Vince Foster, a longtime associate of the Clintons, was found dead of a self-inflicted
 gunshot wound.
 What's False
 There is nothing inherently suspicious about the coincidental timing of Sessions's firing and Vince
 Foster's death (which was determined to be a suicide)
sapphleaf:

libertarirynn:

sapphleaf:

mccarthyites:

eltigrechico:
Gotta love Snopes!
And here I was, an idiot, thinking this post was overly exaggerated for comedic effect


Except what Snopes is actually saying is that, while the explicit claim that the death occurred the day after the firing, what’s false is the implied argument—and often explicitly asserted as well—that the two events have any relation.post hoc ergo propter hoc

Except it still isn’t a “mixture” because the statement “Bill Clinton fired his FBI director the day before Vince Foster died“ is irrefutably correct.

Yeah but it’s still right to point out that implied connection is not based in fact or logic.Yes, the statement at face value is literal truth, but critical thinking means evaluating the truth and validity of the actual argument.

Dude are you being serious right now? As a fact checking site it’s not their job to evaluate what “implied connections“ they need to “correct“. The idea is state what’s true and what’s not. Stating that Bill Clinton fired his FBI director before Vince Foster died is not a “mixture“ of truth and falsehood. Period.
                
            

            
            
sapphleaf:

libertarirynn:

sapphleaf:

mccarthyites:

eltigrechico:
Gotta love Snopes!
And here I was, an idiot, thinking this post was ove...

            
            
        

    



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            



        

            
        
        

            




    Click, Facebook, and Friends: Messenger
 JUL 26, 12:15 PM
 Hello hun!
 I had you on my mind and
 wondered why I hadn't seen you
 on Facebook. Then I realized we're
 no longer friends on here
 JUL 26, 1:01 PM
 Hope you're doing well
 JUL 26, 3:32 PM
 Hi Carma. Hope you're doing well
 too. Yeah I went through my friends
 list this summer to simplify my
 Facebook feed and took out people
 don't know well or talk to. No offense
 intended, just trying to de clutter and
 simplify my life
 Gotcha. well just know I truly miss
 seeing vou on here
 Hope you're doing well
 5:23 PM

 Messenger
 5:23 PM
 Hello
 I wanted to reach out and offer
 you the opportunity to reinstate
 with Scentay for absolutely FREE!
 Once reinstated, I will send you a
 Tew supplies and help you become
 Active within the month which will
 earn you an average of $50!
 So, what ya think?
 Want to make a few extra bucks or
 more??
 Carma
 https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default
 files/documents
 ublic comments/trade-
 requlation-rule-disclosure-
 requirements-and-prohibitions-
 concerning-business
 opportunities-
 ftc.r51 1993-00008%C2%A0/000
 08-57281.pdf
 www.ftc.gov
 ftc.gov

 Messenger
 I'm not sure what that link is hun
 It didnt open for me. Hope you're
 doina well
 Did you click on it? It's studies that
 the federal government has run on
 MLMs which state that only the top
 earners make any profit. The rest of
 most downlines actually go in debt
 trying to do an MLM "side hustle."
 I'm not interested and please don't
 contact me about Scentsy again
 Hope you're doing well too
 Nope it didn't open for me
 although l'd highly disagree
 I make more than some "higher"
 up than me so I know that it's
 TRUE
 We aren't a pyramid scheme or a
 regular 9 to 5 job in which the
 higher ups make more money than
 others.
 Hope you have a great 2019!
Ex scentsy upline hun asks me if I want to come back...pretends to not be able to read link about MLMs being scams
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Click, Facebook, and Friends: Messenger
 JUL 26, 12:15 PM
 Hello hun!
 I had you on my mind and
 wondered why I hadn't seen you
 on Facebook. Then I realized we're
 no longer friends on here
 JUL 26, 1:01 PM
 Hope you're doing well
 JUL 26, 3:32 PM
 Hi Carma. Hope you're doing well
 too. Yeah I went through my friends
 list this summer to simplify my
 Facebook feed and took out people
 don't know well or talk to. No offense
 intended, just trying to de clutter and
 simplify my life
 Gotcha. well just know I truly miss
 seeing vou on here
 Hope you're doing well
 5:23 PM

 Messenger
 5:23 PM
 Hello
 I wanted to reach out and offer
 you the opportunity to reinstate
 with Scentay for absolutely FREE!
 Once reinstated, I will send you a
 Tew supplies and help you become
 Active within the month which will
 earn you an average of $50!
 So, what ya think?
 Want to make a few extra bucks or
 more??
 Carma
 https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default
 files/documents
 ublic comments/trade-
 requlation-rule-disclosure-
 requirements-and-prohibitions-
 concerning-business
 opportunities-
 ftc.r51 1993-00008%C2%A0/000
 08-57281.pdf
 www.ftc.gov
 ftc.gov

 Messenger
 I'm not sure what that link is hun
 It didnt open for me. Hope you're
 doina well
 Did you click on it? It's studies that
 the federal government has run on
 MLMs which state that only the top
 earners make any profit. The rest of
 most downlines actually go in debt
 trying to do an MLM "side hustle."
 I'm not interested and please don't
 contact me about Scentsy again
 Hope you're doing well too
 Nope it didn't open for me
 although l'd highly disagree
 I make more than some "higher"
 up than me so I know that it's
 TRUE
 We aren't a pyramid scheme or a
 regular 9 to 5 job in which the
 higher ups make more money than
 others.
 Hope you have a great 2019!
Ex scentsy upline hun asks me if I want to come back...pretends to not be able to read link about MLMs being scams
                
            

            
            
Ex scentsy upline hun asks me if I want to come back...pretends to not be able to read link about MLMs being scams