Open in
Meme App
Open
Safari
Continue
Chrome
Continue
![Limited: solaredarisen:
randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:
randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:
randomnightlord:
mordinette:
rocketmermaid:
atelierabintra:
pmseymourva:
dreamwalkertara:
enigmaticagentalice:
theheroheart:
glitterpill:
dropkicks:
lesbianmooncolony:
sinbadism:
maxofs2d:
guitarbeard:
alexxdz:
GO WATCH A MOVIE
Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.Â
well this isnât necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donât necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optional âcakewalkâ modes arenât that bad of an idea.
what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode
iâm a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat
honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like âyo do you just wanna skip this bit?âthe gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itâs why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iâm replaying unless iâm specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itâd honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether
Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK IâM ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.Â
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.
Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title: âChoose Your Experienceâ, showing the options âactionâ, ârole playingâ and âstoryâ.]
âActionâ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes. âRole playingâ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. And âstoryâ has the roleplaying but very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a âcasualâ difficulty setting thatâs a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iâve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenât always about winning, or being good at it. Itâs about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.
Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnât games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnât there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donât want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donât understand the resistance at all. What weâre talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youâre adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youâre not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
LikeâŚdo youâŚnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youâll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??
I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itâs a genre that Iâm intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.Â
Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donât fight.
Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iâm all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.
Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.
Iâve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.
Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donât get the full experience?
The different between watching and playing is
Watching youâre seeing someoneâs experience
Playing youâre experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it
Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatâs not worth it
I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC:
Syndicate
Isnât the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood?
Syndicate is based on victorian era & thereâs gangsI literally had to hide because I keep walking to area higher than my current level because of main story line
Goddammit AC. You had one job](https://pics.ballmemes.com/solaredarisen-randomnightlord-solaredarisen-randomnightlord-solaredarisen-randomnightlord-mordinette-rocketmermaid-atelierabintra-pmseymourva-72548735.png)
![Limited: solaredarisen:
randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:
randomnightlord:
mordinette:
rocketmermaid:
atelierabintra:
pmseymourva:
dreamwalkertara:
enigmaticagentalice:
theheroheart:
glitterpill:
dropkicks:
lesbianmooncolony:
sinbadism:
maxofs2d:
guitarbeard:
alexxdz:
GO WATCH A MOVIE
Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.Â
well this isnât necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donât necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optional âcakewalkâ modes arenât that bad of an idea.
what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode
iâm a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat
honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like âyo do you just wanna skip this bit?âthe gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itâs why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iâm replaying unless iâm specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itâd honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether
Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK IâM ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.Â
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.
Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title: âChoose Your Experienceâ, showing the options âactionâ, ârole playingâ and âstoryâ.]
âActionâ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes. âRole playingâ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. And âstoryâ has the roleplaying but very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a âcasualâ difficulty setting thatâs a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iâve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenât always about winning, or being good at it. Itâs about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.
Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnât games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnât there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donât want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donât understand the resistance at all. What weâre talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youâre adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youâre not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
LikeâŚdo youâŚnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youâll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??
I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itâs a genre that Iâm intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.Â
Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donât fight.
Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iâm all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.
Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.
Iâve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.
Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donât get the full experience?
The different between watching and playing is
Watching youâre seeing someoneâs experience
Playing youâre experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it
Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatâs not worth it
I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC:
Syndicate
Isnât the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood?](https://pics.ballmemes.com/solaredarisen-randomnightlord-solaredarisen-randomnightlord-mordinette-rocketmermaid-atelierabintra-pmseymourva-dreamwalkertara-enigmaticagen-72548736.png)
![Limited: solaredarisen:
randomnightlord:
mordinette:
rocketmermaid:
atelierabintra:
pmseymourva:
dreamwalkertara:
enigmaticagentalice:
theheroheart:
glitterpill:
dropkicks:
lesbianmooncolony:
sinbadism:
maxofs2d:
guitarbeard:
alexxdz:
GO WATCH A MOVIE
Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.Â
well this isnât necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donât necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optional âcakewalkâ modes arenât that bad of an idea.
what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode
iâm a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat
honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like âyo do you just wanna skip this bit?âthe gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itâs why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iâm replaying unless iâm specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itâd honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether
Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK IâM ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.Â
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.
Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title: âChoose Your Experienceâ, showing the options âactionâ, ârole playingâ and âstoryâ.]
âActionâ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes. âRole playingâ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. And âstoryâ has the roleplaying but very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a âcasualâ difficulty setting thatâs a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iâve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenât always about winning, or being good at it. Itâs about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.
Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnât games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnât there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donât want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donât understand the resistance at all. What weâre talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youâre adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youâre not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
LikeâŚdo youâŚnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youâll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??
I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itâs a genre that Iâm intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.Â
Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donât fight.
Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iâm all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.
Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.
Iâve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.
Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donât get the full experience?
The different between watching and playing isWatching youâre seeing someoneâs experiencePlaying youâre experiencing itI watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it
Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatâs not worth it](https://pics.ballmemes.com/solaredarisen-randomnightlord-mordinette-rocketmermaid-atelierabintra-pmseymourva-dreamwalkertara-enigmaticagentalice-theheroheart-glitterpil-72548737.png)
![Limited: mordinette:
rocketmermaid:
atelierabintra:
pmseymourva:
dreamwalkertara:
enigmaticagentalice:
theheroheart:
glitterpill:
dropkicks:
lesbianmooncolony:
sinbadism:
maxofs2d:
guitarbeard:
alexxdz:
GO WATCH A MOVIE
Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.Â
well this isnât necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donât necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optional âcakewalkâ modes arenât that bad of an idea.
what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode
iâm a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat
honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like âyo do you just wanna skip this bit?âthe gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itâs why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iâm replaying unless iâm specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itâd honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether
Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK IâM ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.Â
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.
Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title: âChoose Your Experienceâ, showing the options âactionâ, ârole playingâ and âstoryâ.]
âActionâ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes. âRole playingâ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. And âstoryâ has the roleplaying but very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a âcasualâ difficulty setting thatâs a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iâve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenât always about winning, or being good at it. Itâs about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.
Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnât games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnât there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donât want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donât understand the resistance at all. What weâre talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youâre adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youâre not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
LikeâŚdo youâŚnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youâll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??
I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itâs a genre that Iâm intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.Â
Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donât fight.
Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iâm all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.
Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.
Iâve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.
Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donât get the full experience?](https://pics.ballmemes.com/mordinette-rocketmermaid-atelierabintra-pmseymourva-dreamwalkertara-enigmaticagentalice-theheroheart-glitterpill-dropkicks-lesbianmooncolony-72548739.png)
