🔥 | Latest

once upon: Once upon a time, there was a pandemic… And just like that every person self diagnosed with gluten intolerance was cured.
once upon: Once upon a time, there was a pandemic… And just like that every person self diagnosed with gluten intolerance was cured.

Once upon a time, there was a pandemic… And just like that every person self diagnosed with gluten intolerance was cured.

once upon: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: Bruce Lee Was My Friend, and Tarantino's Movie Disrespects Him 8:08 AM PDT 8/16/2019 by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Alamy Stock Photo Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Bruce Lee during the filming of 1978's 'Game of Death.' solacekames: 8:08 AM PDT 8/16/2019 by Kareem Abdul-JabbarThe NBA great and Hollywood Reporter columnist, a friend of the late martial arts star, believes the filmmaker was sloppy, somewhat racist and shirked his responsibility to basic truth in ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.’Remember that time Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. kidney-punched a waiter for serving soggy croutons in his tomato soup? How about the time the Dalai Lama got wasted and spray-painted “Karma Is a Beach” on the Tibetan ambassador’s limo? Probably not, since they never happened. But they could happen if a filmmaker decides to write those scenes into his or her movie. And, even though we know the movie is fiction, those scenes will live on in our shared cultural conscience as impressions of those real people, thereby corrupting our memory of them built on their real-life actions.That’s why filmmakers have a responsibility when playing with people’s perceptions of admired historic people to maintain a basic truth about the content of their character. Quentin Tarantino’s portrayal of Bruce Lee in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood does not live up to this standard. Of course, Tarantino has the artistic right to portray Bruce any way he wants. But to do so in such a sloppy and somewhat racist way is a failure both as an artist and as a human being.This controversy has left me torn. Tarantino is one of my favorite filmmakers because he is so bold, uncompromising and unpredictable. There’s a giddy energy in his movies of someone who loves movies and wants you to love them, too. I attend each Tarantino film as if it were an event, knowing that his distillation of the ’60s and ’70s action movies will be much more entertaining than a simple homage. That’s what makes the Bruce Lee scenes so disappointing, not so much on a factual basis, but as a lapse of cultural awareness.Bruce Lee was my friend and teacher. That doesn’t give him a free pass for how he’s portrayed in movies. But it does give me some insight into the man. I first met Bruce when I was a student at UCLA looking to continue my martial arts studies, which I started in New York City. We quickly developed a friendship as well as a student-teacher relationship. He taught me the discipline and spirituality of martial arts, which was greatly responsible for me being able to play competitively in the NBA for 20 years with very few injuries.During our years of friendship, he spoke passionately about how frustrated he was with the stereotypical representation of Asians in film and TV. The only roles were for inscrutable villains or bowing servants. In Have Gun - Will Travel, Paladin’s faithful Chinese servant goes by the insulting name of “Hey Boy” (Kam Tong). He was replaced in season four by a female character referred to as “Hey Girl” (Lisa Lu). Asian men were portrayed as sexless accessories to a scene, while the women were subservient. This was how African-American men and women were generally portrayed until the advent of Sidney Poitier and blaxploitation films. Bruce was dedicated to changing the dismissive image of Asians through his acting, writing and promotion of Jeet Kune Do, his interpretation of martial arts.That’s why it disturbs me that Tarantino chose to portray Bruce in such a one-dimensional way. The John Wayne machismo attitude of Cliff (Brad Pitt), an aging stuntman who defeats the arrogant, uppity Chinese guy harks back to the very stereotypes Bruce was trying to dismantle. Of course the blond, white beefcake American can beat your fancy Asian chopsocky dude because that foreign crap doesn’t fly here.I might even go along with the skewered version of Bruce if that wasn’t the only significant scene with him, if we’d also seen a glimpse of his other traits, of his struggle to be taken seriously in Hollywood. Alas, he was just another Hey Boy prop to the scene. The scene is complicated by being presented as a flashback, but in a way that could suggest the stuntman’s memory is cartoonishly biased in his favor. Equally disturbing is the unresolved shadow that Cliff may have killed his wife with a spear gun because she nagged him. Classic Cliff. Is Cliff more heroic because he also doesn’t put up with outspoken women?I was in public with Bruce several times when some random jerk would loudly challenge Bruce to a fight. He always politely declined and moved on. First rule of Bruce’s fight club was don’t fight — unless there is no other option. He felt no need to prove himself. He knew who he was and that the real fight wasn’t on the mat, it was on the screen in creating opportunities for Asians to be seen as more than grinning stereotypes. Unfortunately, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood prefers the good old ways.
once upon: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: Bruce
 Lee Was My Friend, and
 Tarantino's Movie Disrespects
 Him
 8:08 AM PDT 8/16/2019 by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
 Alamy Stock Photo
 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Bruce Lee during the filming of 1978's 'Game of Death.'
solacekames:

8:08 AM PDT 8/16/2019 by Kareem Abdul-JabbarThe NBA great and Hollywood Reporter columnist, a friend of the late martial arts star, believes the filmmaker was sloppy, somewhat racist and shirked his responsibility to basic truth in ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.’Remember that time Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. kidney-punched a waiter for serving soggy croutons in his tomato soup? How about the time the Dalai Lama got wasted and spray-painted “Karma Is a Beach” on the Tibetan ambassador’s limo? Probably not, since they never happened. But they could happen if a filmmaker decides to write those scenes into his or her movie. And, even though we know the movie is fiction, those scenes will live on in our shared cultural conscience as impressions of those real people, thereby corrupting our memory of them built on their real-life actions.That’s why filmmakers have a responsibility when playing with people’s perceptions of admired historic people to maintain a basic truth about the content of their character. Quentin Tarantino’s portrayal of Bruce Lee in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood does not live up to this standard. Of course, Tarantino has the artistic right to portray Bruce any way he wants. But to do so in such a sloppy and somewhat racist way is a failure both as an artist and as a human being.This controversy has left me torn. Tarantino is one of my favorite filmmakers because he is so bold, uncompromising and unpredictable. There’s a giddy energy in his movies of someone who loves movies and wants you to love them, too. I attend each Tarantino film as if it were an event, knowing that his distillation of the ’60s and ’70s action movies will be much more entertaining than a simple homage. That’s what makes the Bruce Lee scenes so disappointing, not so much on a factual basis, but as a lapse of cultural awareness.Bruce Lee was my friend and teacher. That doesn’t give him a free pass for how he’s portrayed in movies. But it does give me some insight into the man. I first met Bruce when I was a student at UCLA looking to continue my martial arts studies, which I started in New York City. We quickly developed a friendship as well as a student-teacher relationship. He taught me the discipline and spirituality of martial arts, which was greatly responsible for me being able to play competitively in the NBA for 20 years with very few injuries.During our years of friendship, he spoke passionately about how frustrated he was with the stereotypical representation of Asians in film and TV. The only roles were for inscrutable villains or bowing servants. In Have Gun - Will Travel, Paladin’s faithful Chinese servant goes by the insulting name of “Hey Boy” (Kam Tong). He was replaced in season four by a female character referred to as “Hey Girl” (Lisa Lu). Asian men were portrayed as sexless accessories to a scene, while the women were subservient. This was how African-American men and women were generally portrayed until the advent of Sidney Poitier and blaxploitation films. Bruce was dedicated to changing the dismissive image of Asians through his acting, writing and promotion of Jeet Kune Do, his interpretation of martial arts.That’s why it disturbs me that Tarantino chose to portray Bruce in such a one-dimensional way. The John Wayne machismo attitude of Cliff (Brad Pitt), an aging stuntman who defeats the arrogant, uppity Chinese guy harks back to the very stereotypes Bruce was trying to dismantle. Of course the blond, white beefcake American can beat your fancy Asian chopsocky dude because that foreign crap doesn’t fly here.I might even go along with the skewered version of Bruce if that wasn’t the only significant scene with him, if we’d also seen a glimpse of his other traits, of his struggle to be taken seriously in Hollywood. Alas, he was just another Hey Boy prop to the scene. The scene is complicated by being presented as a flashback, but in a way that could suggest the stuntman’s memory is cartoonishly biased in his favor. Equally disturbing is the unresolved shadow that Cliff may have killed his wife with a spear gun because she nagged him. Classic Cliff. Is Cliff more heroic because he also doesn’t put up with outspoken women?I was in public with Bruce several times when some random jerk would loudly challenge Bruce to a fight. He always politely declined and moved on. First rule of Bruce’s fight club was don’t fight — unless there is no other option. He felt no need to prove himself. He knew who he was and that the real fight wasn’t on the mat, it was on the screen in creating opportunities for Asians to be seen as more than grinning stereotypes. Unfortunately, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood prefers the good old ways.

solacekames: 8:08 AM PDT 8/16/2019 by Kareem Abdul-JabbarThe NBA great and Hollywood Reporter columnist, a friend of the late martial ar...

once upon: Blank Today at 11:11 AM what the actual fuck Windows 10 377 KB o Chazzie Today at 11:12 AM 2 Logan Sanders Today at 11:12 AM hxwko: aroace-from-space: greetings-fiends: spookyboiskully: hextalker: loopof-unhappiness: crows-in-the-sunset: rustybutterknife: cyan-magical-girl: thathighclassbitch: trans-bundle-bun: tryingmy-hardest: skinny-yoongi: alifeuncolored: imstillnotokay: yourelost-itsokay: thomassandersstolemysoul: weareallfandomtrash: wickedlimes: sporkklesofficialblogthing: midnight–fox: depressed-but-doing-my-best: youreverydayinternethobo: im-god-now-fight-me: i-think-im-bi-help: a-slightly-sad-egg: aetherial-incarnate: angel-of-songbirds: thedruidflimbarg: that-one-cryptid-01: once-upon-a-fuck-you: theepitomeofamess: fandom-random2405: spookussie: anxiety-has-anxiety: itsthemoooooooooon: teawithaura: coco-kyoko: 1darkodraco1: ectoimp: plushiegoo: tiny-little-pechen: blasticheart: saferoom45: you-know-thatguy: queennati: mango-sass: doodlindandandani: mickeydagrumpymouse: xincronity: caydebug: micaxiii: shrineart: issac-baldimore: ask-thebaldbo1: asktheawfulschoolhouse: spooky-blue-boi: saltylop: quartelz: gayest-child: alesstra: slushieboy-owo: myfnafstory: minieevee205: underfellgoat: mmtmsansfan: star-rcl: skyler-of-waffles: existenceisanillusion: memelord18: godhatesme-22: softcore-weaboo: shitty-shitposter: bsavaleria: scaredycat-hq: gerdzelinionia: usuallyblank: shrineart: chazkuangshi: :( :( WHY ARE YOU ALL LIKE THIS?? :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( ;( :( :( :( :( The Hell is this bullshit >:T its just a computer crashing get over it :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(  : ( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(
once upon: Blank
 Today at 11:11 AM
 what the actual fuck Windows 10
 377 KB
 o Chazzie
 Today at 11:12 AM
 2
 Logan Sanders
 Today at 11:12 AM
hxwko:

aroace-from-space:
greetings-fiends:

spookyboiskully:


hextalker:


loopof-unhappiness:

crows-in-the-sunset:

rustybutterknife:


cyan-magical-girl:


thathighclassbitch:

trans-bundle-bun:


tryingmy-hardest:


skinny-yoongi:


alifeuncolored:


imstillnotokay:


yourelost-itsokay:


thomassandersstolemysoul:


weareallfandomtrash:


wickedlimes:

sporkklesofficialblogthing:


midnight–fox:

depressed-but-doing-my-best:


youreverydayinternethobo:


im-god-now-fight-me:


i-think-im-bi-help:

a-slightly-sad-egg:


aetherial-incarnate:


angel-of-songbirds:

thedruidflimbarg:


that-one-cryptid-01:


once-upon-a-fuck-you:


theepitomeofamess:

fandom-random2405:


spookussie:


anxiety-has-anxiety:

itsthemoooooooooon:


teawithaura:

coco-kyoko:


1darkodraco1:

ectoimp:


plushiegoo:

tiny-little-pechen:

blasticheart:


saferoom45:


you-know-thatguy:

queennati:

mango-sass:


doodlindandandani:


mickeydagrumpymouse:

xincronity:


caydebug:


micaxiii:


shrineart:

issac-baldimore:

ask-thebaldbo1:

asktheawfulschoolhouse:

spooky-blue-boi:

saltylop:


quartelz:


gayest-child:


alesstra:

slushieboy-owo:

myfnafstory:


minieevee205:


underfellgoat:


mmtmsansfan:

star-rcl:


skyler-of-waffles:


existenceisanillusion:


memelord18:


godhatesme-22:


softcore-weaboo:


shitty-shitposter:


bsavaleria:


scaredycat-hq:


gerdzelinionia:

usuallyblank:

shrineart:

chazkuangshi:
:(
:(

WHY ARE YOU ALL LIKE THIS?? :(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(

:(


:(


:(


:(

:(

:(


;(


:(


:(

:(

:(

The Hell is this bullshit >:T its just a computer crashing get over it

:(

:(


:(


:(


:(

:(


:(


:(

:(

:(


:(


:(

:(

:(


:(

:(


:(

:(


:(

:(


:(


:(

:(


:(


:(


:(

:(


:(


:(

:(


:(


:(


:(

 : (


:(

:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(


:(



:(


:(


:(


:(


:(

:(


:(


:(

:(
:(

:(

hxwko: aroace-from-space: greetings-fiends: spookyboiskully: hextalker: loopof-unhappiness: crows-in-the-sunset: rustybutterknife...

once upon: jumpingjacktrash: avatar-dacia: thisisarebeljyn: fearwax: scootsenshi: 24-sa3t: comradeonion: powerofthestruggle: Man eating rice, China, 1901-1904 this is an extremely important picture Ive never seen someone from 1904 having fun omg He has a nice face No but the history behind this picture is really interesting The reason that everyone always looked miserable in old photos wasn’t that they took too long to take. Once photography became widespread it took only seconds to take a picture. It was because getting your photo taken was treated the same as getting your portrait painted. A very serious occasion meant so thst your descendants would know that ypu existed and what you looked like. But one time some British dudes went to china to go on an anthropological expedition, and they met some rural Chinese farmers and decided to take their pictures. Now, these people weren’t exposed to the weird culture of the time around getting your photo taken, so this guy just flashed a big grin during the photo because he was told to strike a pose and that’s the pose he wanted to strike. I think painted portraits and old photos give us the idea that in general people were just really unhappy because those are the visuals we have. This is so refreshing. Hey, look; “Man Laughing Alone With Rice” is back on my dash. always reblog Happy Rice Guy. once upon a time, he really enjoyed his lunch, and that’s beautiful.
once upon: jumpingjacktrash:
avatar-dacia:

thisisarebeljyn:

fearwax:

scootsenshi:

24-sa3t:

comradeonion:

powerofthestruggle:

Man eating rice, China, 1901-1904

this is an extremely important picture

Ive never seen someone from 1904 having fun omg

He has a nice face

No but the history behind this picture is really interesting
The reason that everyone always looked miserable in old photos wasn’t that they took too long to take. Once photography became widespread it took only seconds to take a picture.
It was because getting your photo taken was treated the same as getting your portrait painted. A very serious occasion meant so thst your descendants would know that ypu existed and what you looked like.
But one time some British dudes went to china to go on an anthropological expedition, and they met some rural Chinese farmers and decided to take their pictures. Now, these people weren’t exposed to the weird culture of the time around getting your photo taken, so this guy just flashed a big grin during the photo because he was told to strike a pose and that’s the pose he wanted to strike.


I think painted portraits and old photos give us the idea that in general people were just really unhappy because those are the visuals we have. This is so refreshing.

Hey, look; “Man Laughing Alone With Rice” is back on my dash.

always reblog Happy Rice Guy. once upon a time, he really enjoyed his lunch, and that’s beautiful.

jumpingjacktrash: avatar-dacia: thisisarebeljyn: fearwax: scootsenshi: 24-sa3t: comradeonion: powerofthestruggle: Man eating rice,...

once upon: gabriellemkari: Once upon a time…a long time ago… 🌾
once upon: gabriellemkari:

Once upon a time…a long time ago… 🌾

gabriellemkari: Once upon a time…a long time ago… 🌾

once upon: priscilla page @BBW_BFF 2h maybe when she returned to earth this time, she crash-landed into a Sephora I am actively angry about how the Russo brothers have Carol styled for Endgame. Why would Captain Marvel suddenly start doing full glam makeup after she's been rocking a minimalist look and then spent even more years in space??? Show this thread ti 54 18 404 wrangletangle: marzipanandminutiae: fandom-is-my-middle-name: alwayslabellavita: oh, it’s still 2012 and we’re doing that thing where a woman can only be badass and strong if she acts and looks in ways that are stereotypically manly???? lol ok Ok I’m just gonna rant about this into the void and not give a shit if anyone comes after me for having an opinion. No one who has a problem with this scene has a problem with make up overall. We stan any awesome human being irrespective of their make up choices. We just have a small teeny tiny issue with the fact that a woman whose signature look is grunge (leather + bike + rock and roll (notice the lack of make up on that list)) has suddenly found the time, in the middle of an apocalypse no doubt, to put on perfectly winged eyeliner and a very flattering shade of lipstick to pair with a sexy top. Not that she looks bad cuz she looks fucking awesome with or without make up and my very bi ass should know. But we just think it’s a teeny tiny coincidence that when a woman was directing this character, she was rocking a typical grunge look and the second the she was put in a dude’s hands, she has on make up that doesn’t fit in with their predicament at all. (this is probably the most polite I can be about this…. Ask @albarosa27. I spent an entire screaming about this with her.) it’s like when Emma Swan got Stepford-ized on Once Upon A Time all over again. there’s nothing wrong with the look in general, but it contradicts the character’s established aesthetic preferences Real life women can wear whatever they want, and I better not hear a word about it from anyone. Female characters who suddenly change their styles when given to the control of a male creator are deeply suspect. The difference is agency. Stop making excuses for blatant sexism; sexist men love it when women lay covering fire for them.
once upon: priscilla page
 @BBW_BFF 2h
 maybe when she returned to earth this time, she crash-landed into a Sephora
 I am actively angry about how the Russo
 brothers have Carol styled for Endgame.
 Why would Captain Marvel suddenly
 start doing full glam makeup after she's
 been rocking a minimalist look and then
 spent even more years in space???
 Show this thread
 ti 54
 18
 404
wrangletangle:

marzipanandminutiae:

fandom-is-my-middle-name:

alwayslabellavita:
oh, it’s still 2012 and we’re doing that thing where a woman can only be badass and strong if she acts and looks in ways that are stereotypically manly???? lol ok
Ok I’m just gonna rant about this into the void and not give a shit if anyone comes after me for having an opinion.
No one who has a problem with this scene has a problem with make up overall. We stan any awesome human being irrespective of their make up choices.
We just have a small teeny tiny issue with the fact that a woman whose signature look is grunge (leather + bike + rock and roll (notice the lack of make up on that list)) has suddenly found the time, in the middle of an apocalypse no doubt, to put on perfectly winged eyeliner and a very flattering shade of lipstick to pair with a sexy top.
Not that she looks bad cuz she looks fucking awesome with or without make up and my very bi ass should know. But we just think it’s a teeny tiny coincidence that when a woman was directing this character, she was rocking a typical grunge look and the second the she was put in a dude’s hands, she has on make up that doesn’t fit in with their predicament at all. 
(this is probably the most polite I can be about this…. Ask @albarosa27. I spent an entire screaming about this with her.)

it’s like when Emma Swan got Stepford-ized on Once Upon A Time all over again. there’s nothing wrong with the look in general, but it contradicts the character’s established aesthetic preferences

Real life women can wear whatever they want, and I better not hear a word about it from anyone. Female characters who suddenly change their styles when given to the control of a male creator are deeply suspect. The difference is agency. Stop making excuses for blatant sexism; sexist men love it when women lay covering fire for them.

wrangletangle: marzipanandminutiae: fandom-is-my-middle-name: alwayslabellavita: oh, it’s still 2012 and we’re doing that thing where...