🔥 | Latest

Bad, Candy, and Cars: Slate.com 5 hrs . Slate Dear Prudie: Do I have to give them candy? aT T-T Help! Kids From Poorer Neighborhoods Keep Trick- or-Treating in Mine. Slate.com Dear Prudence, I live in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the country, but on one of the more "modest" streets-mostly doctors and lawyers and family business owners. (A few blocks away are billionaires, families with famous last names, media moguls, etc.) I have noticed that on Halloween, what seems like 75 percent of the trick-or-treaters are clearly not from this neighborhood. Kids arrive in overflowing cars from less fortunate areas. I feel this is inappropriate. Halloween isn't a social service or a charity in which l have to buy candy for less fortunate children Obviously this makes me feel like a terrible person, because what's the big deal about making less fortunate kids happy on a holiday? But it just bugs me, because we already pay more than enough taxes toward actual social services. Should Halloween be a neighborhood activity, or is it legitimately a free-for-all in which people hunt down the best candy grounds for their kids? 91.6K 705 Slate Slate.com's Post See More memesandmagik: ryulongd: rune-midgarts: goodtimegang: brakehagev2: guys this is actually real like a real person wrote this “more than enough” oh you fucking saints, absolutely pouring wealth onto the unfortunates lol this is amazing Dear Prudie, I think I just witnessed a murder Literally, the entire point of the tradition of trick-or-treating involved feeding your hungry neighbors in exchange for blessings, prayers for your dead, and good luck. To deny someone of a “treat” was bad luck and thought to anger the fae.  So yeah I hope her house gets egged and her wealth mysteriously dissipates without warning. 
Bad, Candy, and Cars: Slate.com
 5 hrs .
 Slate
 Dear Prudie: Do I have to give them candy?
 aT
 T-T
 Help! Kids From Poorer Neighborhoods Keep Trick-
 or-Treating in Mine.
 Slate.com

 Dear Prudence,
 I live in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods
 in the country, but on one of the more
 "modest" streets-mostly doctors and
 lawyers and family business owners. (A few
 blocks away are billionaires, families with
 famous last names, media moguls, etc.) I
 have noticed that on Halloween, what seems
 like 75 percent of the trick-or-treaters are
 clearly not from this neighborhood. Kids
 arrive in overflowing cars from less fortunate
 areas. I feel this is inappropriate. Halloween
 isn't a social service or a charity in which l
 have to buy candy for less fortunate children
 Obviously this makes me feel like a terrible
 person, because what's the big deal about
 making less fortunate kids happy on a
 holiday? But it just bugs me, because we
 already pay more than enough taxes toward
 actual social services. Should Halloween be a
 neighborhood activity, or is it legitimately a
 free-for-all in which people hunt down the
 best candy grounds for their kids?
 91.6K 705
 Slate
 Slate.com's Post
 See More
memesandmagik:
ryulongd:

rune-midgarts:

goodtimegang:

brakehagev2:

guys this is actually real like a real person wrote this

“more than enough” oh you fucking saints, absolutely pouring wealth onto the unfortunates


lol this is amazing 

Dear Prudie,
I think I just witnessed a murder

Literally, the entire point of the tradition of trick-or-treating involved feeding your hungry neighbors in exchange for blessings, prayers for your dead, and good luck. To deny someone of a “treat” was bad luck and thought to anger the fae. 
So yeah I hope her house gets egged and her wealth mysteriously dissipates without warning. 

memesandmagik: ryulongd: rune-midgarts: goodtimegang: brakehagev2: guys this is actually real like a real person wrote this “more than ...

Candy, Cars, and Children: Slate.com 5 hrs . Slate Dear Prudie: Do I have to give them candy? aT T-T Help! Kids From Poorer Neighborhoods Keep Trick- or-Treating in Mine. Slate.com Dear Prudence, I live in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the country, but on one of the more "modest" streets-mostly doctors and lawyers and family business owners. (A few blocks away are billionaires, families with famous last names, media moguls, etc.) I have noticed that on Halloween, what seems like 75 percent of the trick-or-treaters are clearly not from this neighborhood. Kids arrive in overflowing cars from less fortunate areas. I feel this is inappropriate. Halloween isn't a social service or a charity in which l have to buy candy for less fortunate children Obviously this makes me feel like a terrible person, because what's the big deal about making less fortunate kids happy on a holiday? But it just bugs me, because we already pay more than enough taxes toward actual social services. Should Halloween be a neighborhood activity, or is it legitimately a free-for-all in which people hunt down the best candy grounds for their kids? 91.6K 705 Slate Slate.com's Post See More buchergenuss32: wahbegan: teaboot: ryulongd: rune-midgarts: goodtimegang: brakehagev2: guys this is actually real like a real person wrote this “more than enough” oh you fucking saints, absolutely pouring wealth onto the unfortunates lol this is amazing Dear Prudie, I think I just witnessed a murder You fucking monster GET HER PRUDENCE Link!
Candy, Cars, and Children: Slate.com
 5 hrs .
 Slate
 Dear Prudie: Do I have to give them candy?
 aT
 T-T
 Help! Kids From Poorer Neighborhoods Keep Trick-
 or-Treating in Mine.
 Slate.com

 Dear Prudence,
 I live in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods
 in the country, but on one of the more
 "modest" streets-mostly doctors and
 lawyers and family business owners. (A few
 blocks away are billionaires, families with
 famous last names, media moguls, etc.) I
 have noticed that on Halloween, what seems
 like 75 percent of the trick-or-treaters are
 clearly not from this neighborhood. Kids
 arrive in overflowing cars from less fortunate
 areas. I feel this is inappropriate. Halloween
 isn't a social service or a charity in which l
 have to buy candy for less fortunate children
 Obviously this makes me feel like a terrible
 person, because what's the big deal about
 making less fortunate kids happy on a
 holiday? But it just bugs me, because we
 already pay more than enough taxes toward
 actual social services. Should Halloween be a
 neighborhood activity, or is it legitimately a
 free-for-all in which people hunt down the
 best candy grounds for their kids?
 91.6K 705
 Slate
 Slate.com's Post
 See More
buchergenuss32:

wahbegan:
teaboot:

ryulongd:

rune-midgarts:

goodtimegang:

brakehagev2:

guys this is actually real like a real person wrote this

“more than enough” oh you fucking saints, absolutely pouring wealth onto the unfortunates


lol this is amazing 

Dear Prudie,
I think I just witnessed a murder

You fucking monster

GET HER PRUDENCE

Link!

buchergenuss32: wahbegan: teaboot: ryulongd: rune-midgarts: goodtimegang: brakehagev2: guys this is actually real like a real person w...

Animals, Be Like, and Butthurt: Love this IN THE FIGHTIN MANSPREADING WITH BLEACH 3,381,716 Views In the Now 26 September at 19:00 Like Page This is a pretty extreme way to combat #manspreading 2 Comments 26K Shares b Like Comment Share Hahaha.. on the bus, for every guy sitting next to me Like Reply-9h learn, it's like training dogs isn't it Like Reply 5h absolutely! They might actually learn, it's like training dogs isn't it Like Reply 5h Write a reply.. This is a pretty extreme way to combat #manspreading". Jeez, can you imagine what you lot would be like if blokes went around pouring water over girls, and then comparing the act to be like "training dogs"? The amount of outroar, butthurt, and accusations of assault would be phenomenal Like Reply 23m Edited I think you've misinterpreted my words, I never said I agree with the actions. I just love that someone is actually standing up against it as it's incredibly rude/uncomfortable and females don't feel they have a choice when having to squeeze up when a male next time them is being inconsiderate and manspreading I do disagree and think it's extreme; but I understand the women have been doing it to create a statement. My comm pouring/spraying water is commonly used to train dogs/cats and by using this action we are essentially treating males as animals. No where in the comments did my friend or l state we agree with the act of pouring water on the males ent about training dogs is purely that Like Reply 18m "love this" and sharing it is clearly showing your support for this kind of treatment, and by making the reference and connection to spraying them like animals - that's just degrading in itself, imagine if a guy had said that about trying to get women to stop doing things that annoy them? You can make a statement without mildly assaulting people on public transport Yes I do support the statement, and I'm proud females are standing up against it. Doesn't mean I agree with the course of action. And in no way did I state otherwise. You may have misinterpreted and assumed the post as act of complete agreement. Like Reply 8m Shares post*, "love this", "it's like training dogs "You may have misinterpreted and assumed the post as act of complete agreement." And you wonder why? Like Reply-1m About pouring bleach in peoples laps: "I can post and say what I want on social media but when you call me out on it you're the one who's wrong and you've misinterpreted it."
Animals, Be Like, and Butthurt: Love this
 IN THE
 FIGHTIN
 MANSPREADING
 WITH BLEACH
 3,381,716 Views
 In the Now
 26 September at 19:00
 Like Page
 This is a pretty extreme way to combat #manspreading
 2 Comments 26K Shares
 b Like
 Comment
 Share
 Hahaha.. on the bus, for every guy sitting next to me
 Like Reply-9h
 learn, it's like training dogs isn't it
 Like Reply 5h

 absolutely! They might actually
 learn, it's like training dogs isn't it
 Like Reply 5h
 Write a reply..
 This is a pretty extreme way to combat
 #manspreading". Jeez, can you imagine what you lot would be like if
 blokes went around pouring water over girls, and then comparing the
 act to be like "training dogs"? The amount of outroar, butthurt, and
 accusations of assault would be phenomenal
 Like Reply 23m Edited
 I think you've misinterpreted
 my words, I never said I agree with the actions. I just love
 that someone is actually standing up against it as it's
 incredibly rude/uncomfortable and females don't feel they
 have a choice when having to squeeze up when a male
 next time them is being inconsiderate and manspreading
 I do disagree and think it's extreme; but I understand the
 women have been doing it to create a statement. My
 comm
 pouring/spraying water is commonly used to train
 dogs/cats and by using this action we are essentially
 treating males as animals. No where in the comments did
 my friend or l state we agree with the act of pouring water
 on the males
 ent about training dogs is purely that
 Like Reply 18m
 "love this" and sharing it is clearly showing your support for
 this kind of treatment, and by making the reference and
 connection to spraying them like animals - that's just
 degrading in itself, imagine if a guy had said that about trying
 to get women to stop doing things that annoy them? You can
 make a statement without mildly assaulting people on public
 transport

 Yes I do support the statement, and I'm
 proud females are standing up against it. Doesn't mean I
 agree with the course of action.
 And in no way did I state otherwise. You may have
 misinterpreted and assumed the post as act of complete
 agreement.
 Like Reply 8m
 Shares post*, "love this", "it's
 like training dogs
 "You may have misinterpreted and assumed the post as act
 of complete agreement."
 And you wonder why?
 Like Reply-1m
About pouring bleach in peoples laps: "I can post and say what I want on social media but when you call me out on it you're the one who's wrong and you've misinterpreted it."

About pouring bleach in peoples laps: "I can post and say what I want on social media but when you call me out on it you're the one who's wr...