🔥 | Latest

Alive, America, and Bbb: did you know? On NielsenPanel.org you can get paid to use the internet like you normally do! Nielsen, the company that does TV ratings, now measures the popularity of websites and online videos To do that, they'll truly pay you just to #1: Install their app on your smartphone or computer, #2: Use the internet the same as you normally do, and #3: GET PAID. It's that easy! Nielsen gathers data anonymously and it won't slow down your device. Room on the panel is limited but they're still accepting new members now. nielsen PHOTO: NIELSEN DID YOU KNOW? moneypets: lazyproblems: collegehackable: zarb: It takes like 5 minutes to sign up here! Nielsen is the real deal so I’m pretty excited about this. They’re already paying people to watch TV, now they’re gonna pay me to watch vine comps…. I’M LIVING IN 3019 Reblogging to save a bank account Nielsen is absolutely amazing and I completely vouch for them! They have an A+ BBB rating and they’ve been a trusted name since the 1920s, first measuring what radio stations peopled listened to, then getting into TV ratings, and now they measure the popularity of websites and online videos! So yes, you can quite literally get paid to watch youtube videos. What a time to be alive indeed. Pro-tip: to make the most money, you guys should Join the Nielsen panel on your computer AND your phone because they pay for each device that you connect. You can expect to earn about $50 per device this year and you can win up to $1000 in one month during their monthly sweepstakes! In addition to regular rewards, Nielsen gives away $10,000 each month. All you have to do is keep the Nielsen app installed on your computer and you’ll be entered into the sweepstakes. Top prize earners take home $1,000 each, and 400 people win cash prizes. To everyone worried about what data they collect, this is from their website: TL;DR they only want to know what websites you visit, and how much time you spend on these sites. They NEVER collect sensitive data such as usernames, passwords, login information, bank, or credit card information. So if you could use some extra cash, you honestly have nothing to lose! For once in your life, get paid for your browsing history rather than other people getting paid for it. IN 2019 WE LIVE IN 3019 Signal boost. This works in a bunch of places! You can sign up for Nielsen from America (Computer or Smartphone) Canada (Homescan panel) Germany (Computer or Smartphone) United Kingdom (Computer only) Italy (Computer or Smartphone) Australia (Smartphone only) New Zealand (Computer only) Hong Kong (Smartphone only) Switzerland (Homescan panel) Finland (Homescan panel) Portugal (Homescan panel) Spain (Homescan panel)
Alive, America, and Bbb: did you know?
 On NielsenPanel.org you can get paid to use
 the internet like you normally do! Nielsen, the
 company that does TV ratings, now measures
 the popularity of websites and online videos
 To do that, they'll truly pay you just to #1: Install
 their app on your smartphone or computer,
 #2: Use the internet the same as you normally
 do, and #3: GET PAID. It's that easy! Nielsen
 gathers data anonymously and it won't slow
 down your device. Room on the panel is limited
 but they're still accepting new members now.
 nielsen
 PHOTO: NIELSEN
 DID YOU KNOW?
moneypets:

lazyproblems:

collegehackable:

zarb:
It takes like 5 minutes to sign up here! Nielsen is the real deal so I’m pretty excited about this. They’re already paying people to watch TV, now they’re gonna pay me to watch vine comps…. I’M LIVING IN 3019
Reblogging to save a bank account
Nielsen is absolutely amazing and I completely vouch for them! They have an A+ BBB rating and they’ve been a trusted name since the 1920s, first measuring what radio stations peopled listened to, then getting into TV ratings, and now they measure the popularity of websites and online videos! So yes, you can quite literally get paid to watch youtube videos. What a time to be alive indeed.
Pro-tip: to make the most money, you guys should Join the Nielsen panel on your computer AND your phone because they pay for each device that you connect. You can expect to earn about $50 per device this year and you can win up to $1000 in one month during their monthly sweepstakes! In addition to regular rewards, Nielsen gives away $10,000 each month. All you have to do is keep the Nielsen app installed on your computer and you’ll be entered into the sweepstakes. Top prize earners take home $1,000 each, and 400 people win cash prizes.
To everyone worried about what data they collect, this is from their website:
TL;DR they only want to know what websites you visit, and how much time you spend on these sites. They NEVER collect sensitive data such as usernames, passwords, login information, bank, or credit card information. So if you could use some extra cash, you honestly have nothing to lose!

For once in your life, get paid for your browsing history rather than other people getting paid for it.

IN 2019 WE LIVE IN 3019



Signal boost. This works in a bunch of places! You can sign up for Nielsen from

America (Computer or Smartphone)

Canada (Homescan panel)

Germany (Computer or Smartphone)

United Kingdom (Computer only)

Italy (Computer or Smartphone)

Australia (Smartphone only)

New Zealand (Computer only)

Hong Kong (Smartphone only)

Switzerland (Homescan panel)

Finland (Homescan panel)

Portugal (Homescan panel)

Spain (Homescan panel)

moneypets: lazyproblems: collegehackable: zarb: It takes like 5 minutes to sign up here! Nielsen is the real deal so I’m pretty excited a...

Bill Clinton, Dude, and Fbi: Did Bill Clinton Fire His FBI Director One Day Before Vince Foster Died? Rating Mixture About this rating What's True President Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions on 19 July 1993, one day before Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, a longtime associate of the Clintons, was found dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. What's False There is nothing inherently suspicious about the coincidental timing of Sessions's firing and Vince Foster's death (which was determined to be a suicide) sapphleaf: libertarirynn: sapphleaf: mccarthyites: eltigrechico: Gotta love Snopes! And here I was, an idiot, thinking this post was overly exaggerated for comedic effect Except what Snopes is actually saying is that, while the explicit claim that the death occurred the day after the firing, what’s false is the implied argument—and often explicitly asserted as well—that the two events have any relation.post hoc ergo propter hoc Except it still isn’t a “mixture” because the statement “Bill Clinton fired his FBI director the day before Vince Foster died“ is irrefutably correct. Yeah but it’s still right to point out that implied connection is not based in fact or logic.Yes, the statement at face value is literal truth, but critical thinking means evaluating the truth and validity of the actual argument. Dude are you being serious right now? As a fact checking site it’s not their job to evaluate what “implied connections“ they need to “correct“. The idea is state what’s true and what’s not. Stating that Bill Clinton fired his FBI director before Vince Foster died is not a “mixture“ of truth and falsehood. Period.
Bill Clinton, Dude, and Fbi: Did Bill Clinton Fire His FBI
 Director One Day Before Vince
 Foster Died?

 Rating
 Mixture
 About this rating
 What's True
 President Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions on 19 July 1993, one day before Deputy White
 House Counsel Vince Foster, a longtime associate of the Clintons, was found dead of a self-inflicted
 gunshot wound.
 What's False
 There is nothing inherently suspicious about the coincidental timing of Sessions's firing and Vince
 Foster's death (which was determined to be a suicide)
sapphleaf:

libertarirynn:

sapphleaf:

mccarthyites:

eltigrechico:
Gotta love Snopes!
And here I was, an idiot, thinking this post was overly exaggerated for comedic effect


Except what Snopes is actually saying is that, while the explicit claim that the death occurred the day after the firing, what’s false is the implied argument—and often explicitly asserted as well—that the two events have any relation.post hoc ergo propter hoc

Except it still isn’t a “mixture” because the statement “Bill Clinton fired his FBI director the day before Vince Foster died“ is irrefutably correct.

Yeah but it’s still right to point out that implied connection is not based in fact or logic.Yes, the statement at face value is literal truth, but critical thinking means evaluating the truth and validity of the actual argument.

Dude are you being serious right now? As a fact checking site it’s not their job to evaluate what “implied connections“ they need to “correct“. The idea is state what’s true and what’s not. Stating that Bill Clinton fired his FBI director before Vince Foster died is not a “mixture“ of truth and falsehood. Period.

sapphleaf: libertarirynn: sapphleaf: mccarthyites: eltigrechico: Gotta love Snopes! And here I was, an idiot, thinking this post was ove...

Club, Life, and Omg: vouandmeforevermore one time in 2007 i crashed the entire club penguin website. it was down for 2 days. i was banned for life youandmeforevermore stateofgracc we need to know more wxndxriand What many of you have asked, and so i shall give: in 2007, my older brother gave me a small piece of information that would soon result in the shutdown of Club Penguin for a few days. he taught me a glitch in the club penguin system that, when sitting in the coffee shop, would make your penguin sit on the ceiling of the coffee shop instead and with this piece of information, i took off. i spent hours going to every server over and over, saying the same message: everyone meet in the coffee shop tomorrow at 7 pm in the snowball server. i did this in every single server, in every location i could find. then, finally, 7 pm the next day arrived snowball had a population rating of 5. penguin:s poured into the coffee shop, all awaiting my instructions. i then gave the next message, that of the glitch. i told everyone to wait exactly 3 minutes, then perform the glitch. they did. every penguin in the coffee shop was suddenly on the ceiling, and either the club penguin coding or the club penguin offices had no idea what to do, and no way to take us down. for a small glimpse of time, we ruled victorious nothing and no one could stop us. every great kingdom awaits its downfall however. eventually, the website crashed. no one could go on the website for 2 days after that. my penguin was banned for life. Every kingdom awaits its downfall
Club, Life, and Omg: vouandmeforevermore
 one time in 2007 i crashed the entire club
 penguin website. it was down for 2 days. i was
 banned for life
 youandmeforevermore
 stateofgracc
 we need to know more
 wxndxriand
 What
 many of you have asked, and so i shall give:
 in 2007, my older brother gave me a small piece
 of information that would soon result in the
 shutdown of Club Penguin for a few days. he
 taught me a glitch in the club penguin system
 that, when sitting in the coffee shop, would
 make your penguin sit on the ceiling of the
 coffee shop instead
 and with this piece of information, i took off. i
 spent hours going to every server over and
 over, saying the same message: everyone meet
 in the coffee shop tomorrow at 7 pm in the
 snowball server. i did this in every single server,
 in every location i could find.
 then, finally, 7 pm the next day arrived
 snowball had a population rating of 5. penguin:s
 poured into the coffee shop, all awaiting my
 instructions. i then gave the next message, that
 of the glitch. i told everyone to wait exactly 3
 minutes, then perform the glitch. they did.
 every penguin in the coffee shop was suddenly
 on the ceiling, and either the club penguin
 coding or the club penguin offices had no idea
 what to do, and no way to take us down. for a
 small glimpse of time, we ruled victorious
 nothing and no one could stop us.
 every great kingdom awaits its downfall
 however. eventually, the website crashed. no
 one could go on the website for 2 days after
 that. my penguin was banned for life.

Every kingdom awaits its downfall

Every kingdom awaits its downfall

Best Friend, Books, and Fanfiction: katy-l-wood I think growing up on a steady diet of fanfiction made me hate traditional book genres. Like, I don't care what the overall "theme" is. Gimme the tags. Is there character death? Sibling rivalry? Snarky best friend? That'll do way more to get me into a book than slotting it into one of a dozen strictly defined boxes that tells me almost nothing gallusrostromegalus Last time I was in a bookstore I was rifling through the paperbacks going "where the hell is the Content rating? is this 'mature or are we in for actual funtimes here? And where are the Content Warnings? whatcha got here book? You gonna get weird on me?" So really, Ao3 has me spoiled wheresquidsdare This gave me a brilliant idea for book displays at the library. #angst #enemies to lovers #plot twist katy-l-wood You are a good librarian! wheresquidsdare None eangst aplot twist awkward #6on't judge a book by its cover I only have flat shelves to work with but.... did it noctnoku I found a book in the library with content tags and suddenly I realised what l'd been missing all this time MORE? w Alsoa FILE UNDER IS BN 97 FANTASY Savage Lands Vengeful Gods An Expected Journey Battalions at War 9 780857 U.S suallenparker Is there a blog for that? Like a blog where people recommend books and like give them their tags? Because I feel like that would be AMAZING stillthewordgirl Tempted to start doing this whenever I read/reread something enniferrpovey Reblogging this version for awesome librarians! fandomsandanythingelse I'm doing this when I write a novel Source: katy-l-wood 34,614 notes Content Tags
Best Friend, Books, and Fanfiction: katy-l-wood
 I think growing up on a steady diet of fanfiction made
 me hate traditional book genres. Like, I don't care
 what the overall "theme" is. Gimme the tags. Is there
 character death? Sibling rivalry? Snarky best friend?
 That'll do way more to get me into a book than slotting
 it into one of a dozen strictly defined boxes that tells
 me almost nothing
 gallusrostromegalus
 Last time I was in a bookstore I was rifling through
 the paperbacks going "where the hell is the Content
 rating? is this 'mature or are we in for actual funtimes
 here? And where are the Content Warnings? whatcha
 got here book? You gonna get weird on me?"
 So really, Ao3 has me spoiled
 wheresquidsdare
 This gave me a brilliant idea for book displays at the
 library. #angst #enemies to lovers #plot twist
 katy-l-wood
 You are a good librarian!
 wheresquidsdare
 None
 eangst
 aplot twist
 awkward
 #6on't judge a book
 by its cover
 I only have flat shelves to work with but.... did it
 noctnoku
 I found a book in the library with content tags and
 suddenly I realised what l'd been missing all this time
 MORE? w
 Alsoa
 FILE UNDER IS BN 97
 FANTASY
 Savage Lands
 Vengeful Gods
 An Expected Journey
 Battalions at War
 9 780857
 U.S
 suallenparker
 Is there a blog for that? Like a blog where people
 recommend books and like give them their tags?
 Because I feel like that would be AMAZING
 stillthewordgirl
 Tempted to start doing this whenever I read/reread
 something
 enniferrpovey
 Reblogging this version for awesome librarians!
 fandomsandanythingelse
 I'm doing this when I write a novel
 Source: katy-l-wood
 34,614 notes
Content Tags

Content Tags

Doctor, Fall, and Gif: Jamie McKelvie @McKelvie Follow Ah yes, he's right, the ratings have dropped to *checks notes* their highest since the Tennant years Jeremy Vine On 5JeremyVineOn5 Has Doctor Who become too politically correct? Ratings have dropped, with fans complaining the story lines, including a man giving birth, are just too PC. Do. GIF 12:38 PM- 9 Nov 2018 3,249 Retweets 12,491 Likes aurordream: The average rating for Peter Capaldi’s last season was 5.8 million viewers. No episode that season rated above 6.68 million - and that rating was for the season premiere. That season featured the only two episodes to rate below 5 million viewers EVER since Doctor Who was revived in 2005. The season before that the average rating was 6.20 million. That was the first season since 2005 not to have a single episode rate over 7 million viewers. Every season before that had an average rating in the 7 millions, except for season 4 in 2008 which averaged 8.42 million. Incidentally, that was David Tennant’s last full season, and the final full season before the Moffatt years. Whilst the ratings have only been announced for 4 episodes so far, not a single episode of Jodie Whittaker’s first sesason has fallen below 8 million viewers. The average rating so far has been 9.15 million. Its true that it is unlikely the average will stay that high - ratings have technically been dropping week by week. Exactly as happened every season in the past - it is perfectly normal for ratings to fall towards the middle of a season, and rise again for the finale. A lot of the media will just do anything to discredit this season because they can’t handle the fact the Doctor is female now.
Doctor, Fall, and Gif: Jamie McKelvie
 @McKelvie
 Follow
 Ah yes, he's right, the ratings have
 dropped to *checks notes* their highest
 since the Tennant years
 Jeremy Vine On 5JeremyVineOn5
 Has Doctor Who become too politically correct?
 Ratings have dropped, with fans complaining the story
 lines, including a man giving birth, are just too PC. Do.
 GIF
 12:38 PM- 9 Nov 2018
 3,249 Retweets 12,491 Likes
aurordream:
The average rating for Peter Capaldi’s last season was 5.8 million viewers. No episode that season rated above 6.68 million - and that rating was for the season premiere. That season featured the only two episodes to rate below 5 million viewers EVER since Doctor Who was revived in 2005.
The season before that the average rating was 6.20 million. That was the first season since 2005 not to have a single episode rate over 7 million viewers. Every season before that had an average rating in the 7 millions, except for season 4 in 2008 which averaged 8.42 million. Incidentally, that was David Tennant’s last full season, and the final full season before the Moffatt years.
Whilst the ratings have only been announced for 4 episodes so far, not a single episode of Jodie Whittaker’s first sesason has fallen below 8 million viewers. The average rating so far has been 9.15 million. Its true that it is unlikely the average will stay that high - ratings have technically been dropping week by week. Exactly as happened every season in the past - it is perfectly normal for ratings to fall towards the middle of a season, and rise again for the finale.
A lot of the media will just do anything to discredit this season because they can’t handle the fact the Doctor is female now.

aurordream: The average rating for Peter Capaldi’s last season was 5.8 million viewers. No episode that season rated above 6.68 million - an...

Doctor, Fall, and Gif: Jamie McKelvie @McKelvie Follow Ah yes, he's right, the ratings have dropped to *checks notes* their highest since the Tennant years Jeremy Vine On 5JeremyVineOn5 Has Doctor Who become too politically correct? Ratings have dropped, with fans complaining the story lines, including a man giving birth, are just too PC. Do. GIF 12:38 PM- 9 Nov 2018 3,249 Retweets 12,491 Likes aurordream: The average rating for Peter Capaldi’s last season was 5.8 million viewers. No episode that season rated above 6.68 million - and that rating was for the season premiere. That season featured the only two episodes to rate below 5 million viewers EVER since Doctor Who was revived in 2005. The season before that the average rating was 6.20 million. That was the first season since 2005 not to have a single episode rate over 7 million viewers. Every season before that had an average rating in the 7 millions, except for season 4 in 2008 which averaged 8.42 million. Incidentally, that was David Tennant’s last full season, and the final full season before the Moffatt years. Whilst the ratings have only been announced for 4 episodes so far, not a single episode of Jodie Whittaker’s first sesason has fallen below 8 million viewers. The average rating so far has been 9.15 million. Its true that it is unlikely the average will stay that high - ratings have technically been dropping week by week. Exactly as happened every season in the past - it is perfectly normal for ratings to fall towards the middle of a season, and rise again for the finale. A lot of the media will just do anything to discredit this season because they can’t handle the fact the Doctor is female now.
Doctor, Fall, and Gif: Jamie McKelvie
 @McKelvie
 Follow
 Ah yes, he's right, the ratings have
 dropped to *checks notes* their highest
 since the Tennant years
 Jeremy Vine On 5JeremyVineOn5
 Has Doctor Who become too politically correct?
 Ratings have dropped, with fans complaining the story
 lines, including a man giving birth, are just too PC. Do.
 GIF
 12:38 PM- 9 Nov 2018
 3,249 Retweets 12,491 Likes
aurordream:
The average rating for Peter Capaldi’s last season was 5.8 million viewers. No episode that season rated above 6.68 million - and that rating was for the season premiere. That season featured the only two episodes to rate below 5 million viewers EVER since Doctor Who was revived in 2005.
The season before that the average rating was 6.20 million. That was the first season since 2005 not to have a single episode rate over 7 million viewers. Every season before that had an average rating in the 7 millions, except for season 4 in 2008 which averaged 8.42 million. Incidentally, that was David Tennant’s last full season, and the final full season before the Moffatt years.
Whilst the ratings have only been announced for 4 episodes so far, not a single episode of Jodie Whittaker’s first sesason has fallen below 8 million viewers. The average rating so far has been 9.15 million. Its true that it is unlikely the average will stay that high - ratings have technically been dropping week by week. Exactly as happened every season in the past - it is perfectly normal for ratings to fall towards the middle of a season, and rise again for the finale.
A lot of the media will just do anything to discredit this season because they can’t handle the fact the Doctor is female now.

aurordream: The average rating for Peter Capaldi’s last season was 5.8 million viewers. No episode that season rated above 6.68 million - an...